traditional thought with a contemporary twist
joanofarc
Published on March 27, 2004 By Joan of Arc In Philosophy
Webster’s defines feminism as the “principle that women should have political, economic and social rights that are equal to those of men”. I would like to express my views regarding this subject as I am a feminist in the truest sense of the word, however, I believe that feminism has become twisted and tainted by special interest parties and the results have been devastating to our gender.

Historically, feminism was a fire that burned in the hearts of devout Christian woman who, because of their belief in the Bible, which declared there to be “no male or female”, that is no partiality between the sexes in God’s view. At the time, woman had no legal rights and were considered inferior and were therefore subservient to men. The spiritual truth of equality ignited the passion which began many of the founding woman’s rights movements in our nation.

The fight for equality (feminism) finds it’s roots first in individuals whose hearts cry for equality blazed the way. In 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote “A Vindication of the Rights of Women”, one of the first books to claim that women should have equality with men. Sara Moore Grimke wrote an essay called “Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condition of Woman” in 1838, one of the first works by an American on the subject. Lucretia Coffin Mott founded two anti slavery groups as well as organized the first women’s rights meeting in the U.S. She became a Quaker minister and founded Swarthmore College.
Women were not allowed to vote in the United States until the required number of states ratified the 19th Amendment to the Constitution in 1920. The struggle for suffrage stretched over almost a century pioneered by Susan B. Anthony and Martha Carey Thomas. These woman believed that woman were equal to men and fought for that truth to be recognized within our society.
The Great Depression and perhaps the industrialization of society sent more men and woman from home to make ends meet. Fast forward to the 50's and 60's where the “Women’s Liberation” movement took off. This movement represented a fundamental change in the original intention of it’s predecessors and herein lies the problem. Woman burned their bras, opened their own doors and sang along with Helen Ready “I am woman hear me roar” all to the underlying tune of “there is no difference between men and women and we want to be treated exactly the same”.

Equal is different than the same. Equality recognizes our fundamental gender differences and celebrates those differences proclaiming that each gender is uniquely valuable and necessary and therefore should have equality in society. The assertion that we are all the same nullifies the difference and uniqueness and thereby devalues both genders suggesting that the only fair society is a de-gendered one in which neither is celebrated.

Disagree? Look at where we are gals. Women’s styles have become increasingly more masculine, not the other way around. Not only that but the socially celebrated body type is that of a young adolescent male, no bumps, no curves. It’s no wonder that women all struggle with self esteem and I’ll go so far as to say that is a primary factor in the development of the social rampage of eating disorders.

More woman, the statistics are ridiculous, have been the targets of sexual abuse/harassment than ever. In fact, our media, in the name of freedom, in proclaiming to the world that our gender may be used and abused in any way anyone can invent. There is no such thing as respect for sensitivity of women. Like it or not it is locker room mentality for us all, ladies.

Most of us now work full time, care for the kids and house and many of us have been abandoned by that significant other who contributed to the creating of our chaos. Men are less responsible for everything than they’ve ever been and we are quickly becoming a matriarch society. If that sounds appealing to you check out the Carribean countries where the women have been carrying all the responsibilities for decades. What is their number one priority? To try to teach their sons to take responsibility. Why?

It is because each gender, male and female, is unique. Men and women together must be equal in sharing both the privileges and responsibilities in society in order for it to function in health. Each gender represents something that can not be duplicated by mere action, as gender is deeply entwined within our being and is at the core of who we are. We are equal but we are different and we need each other to operate in our uniqueness to find wellness in society once more.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 27, 2004
Hmmm, can't say that I agree with anything you said, but that's coming from a rebellious teenager. I do see where you're coming from, though I find it a little close-minded. I'm sure you knew someone would say that, and seeing as how you were trying to have a different opinion than the majority, it's rather ironic.

Trinitie

p.s. No, my opinions won't change with time, not on this anyway. I'm sick of people telling me that.
on Mar 27, 2004
thats curious--or I'm curious--you don't agree that equal is different than the same or you don't agree that men and woman are uniquely valuble--or you don't agree that woman are carrying a heavier load in society than any time in history?
I am taken aback by your saying you think I am closed minded--you're right ! It is ironic.
joa
on Mar 28, 2004
My definitions of words or phrases like "closed minded" differ greatly from the norm. You're article really was insightful, I just happened to disagree. No, I don't think women are carrying and heavier load than any time in history. Not at all.

Trinitie
on Mar 28, 2004
I think there is a heavier load to carry because of the pressures of a society in which time is more valuable than any other currency, and men and women both shoulder the burden. Do women carry a greater percentage? Couldn't tell you, I've never been one.

~Dan
on Mar 28, 2004
still curious trin-
joa
on Mar 28, 2004
Couldn't tell you, I've never been one.

true true.......................



on Mar 28, 2004
Ok, I have trouble stating my opinion in a persuasive way, and I'm not nearly as good at backing myself up as your son is...but here goes:

When you say we have a heavier load now (maybe no we, seeing as how I'm still a teen, but you in any case), that makes it seem like, to me, that you're belitting what women did in the past. Homemaking and raising children is no less trying than what women do today. Now, I know women do all that PLUS outside working now, but men help...maybe you just don't see a lot of it. Responsibilities have only become shared now, not all put on one sex. I was raised by my dad, and though it wasn't the best childhood, I knew I was loved, which is more than I can I got from my crack-head mother.

Oh, and when you say "Women’s styles have become increasingly more masculine, not the other way around. Not only that but the socially celebrated body type is that of a young adolescent male, no bumps, no curves. It’s no wonder that women all struggle with self esteem and I’ll go so far as to say that is a primary factor in the development of the social rampage of eating disorders."...that's what makes me angriest. So what if that's the body type we celebrate, why not celebrate every body type, because is someone like Calista Flockhart was born the way she is, wouldn't she feel left out if all men in America wanted were curves? Do you see what I'm getting at?

Trinitie
on Mar 28, 2004
Here's wishing I knew who Calista Flockhart was...

~Dan
on Mar 28, 2004
It sounds like your Dad is doing a good job but your mom is relatively uninvolved. While this actually points out a bias, it does support my intended point, that people are not sharing responsibility. I happen to think it is more often the woman that gets saddled with the whole kit and caboodle.
Why not celebrate every body type! Exactly!! Why have we chosen one that 95% of us are not--you understand that when I say celebrate, I am saying that this has become the standard that we are all aspiring to. I just don't see it as realistic--I am not saying that there is anything wrong with that type but rather it changes the definition of what is "feminine" in the eyes of society--mostly those up and coming such as yourself.
on Mar 29, 2004
Calista Flockhart=Ally Mcbeal...the anorexic looking chick that get's a lot of crap because of it. She can't help the way she's built.

Trinitie
on Mar 29, 2004
Here's wishing I knew who the jeck Ally Mcbeal is.

~Dan
on Mar 29, 2004

Women are women and men are men.


Scientifically proven:  (can look it up if you want)


 - Men focus on one task at a time.  The task at hand.  They don't think about the fact that they are leavign work late.   They don't think about how they have to go food shopping while they're mowing the lawn, etc.  They are better for work/career type activities.


 - Women are always taking all things into account.  If they're cutting the grass they are thinking abuot how a child might trip over that rock over there.   When they're at work,they consider if their kids made it home safely, etc etc etc.  They are better cut out for handling multiple things at once, which in turn makes them better at caring for other's needs, ie...children.


There's exceptions sure, and women should have the RIGHT to play whatever roll the want, but some tendancies and abilities are just natural.

on Mar 29, 2004
joa--good article. I have often had a hard time with people who misused the definition of feminism--not all feminists are out there burning their bras to prove their points. In college my favorite t-shirt read: "Feminism: The radical notion that men and women are created equal."

Calista Flockhart=Ally Mcbeal...the anorexic looking chick that get's a lot of crap because of it. She can't help the way she's built.


She's not getting "crap" for the way she's built, she's getting "crap" for dropping an extreme amount of weight between seasons one and two. The media handled it poorly (as they usually do). But couple her weight loss with the dramatic weight loss of Jennifer Ainston (check out the first season, she looks REMARKABLY different), throw in a Laura Flynn Boyle, and you have presented the world with the idea that women need to be a size zero to be successful.

Regardless of all this, I still think the point that joa was trying to make that was while we are adding increase value to the "boyish" figure (fair play, if that's the way you are built, celebrate it!) we are devaluing naturally curvy figures--hollywoods norms play a significant role in shaping the minds and body images of women--which in turn causes eating disorders. Why was it such a big deal that J.Lo was popular and had hips?

My definitions of words or phrases like "closed minded" differ greatly from the norm.


Trinitie: What's your definition? I'm just curious. (also on a side note to one of your other comments: I think you state your opinions in a very persuasive way--give yourself more credit, you've earned it!)

on Mar 29, 2004

I, personally, think the "women's lib" movement screwed us all.  The very basis of feminism is one thing, but the womens lib movement was over the top.  Fighting for the right to vote, equal treatment, etc. is one thing, but so many women in the work force has really hosed things.  Just look at the average size house and cost of that house from the 50's and compare it to the average size house and cost of that house now.  "Inflation" doesn't cover it.  The only thing that can even hold a candle to it is the cost of cars.

We have many more single parent families.  We have more youth issues.  We have more people on assistance.  We have more social issues.  Will it ever change back?  No.  Because ignorance is bliss, but we're not ignorant to the "lifestyle" that a dual income family can have.  Divorce is too easy.  And the pantyhose market is in decline (I have no proof of that one.....but how many women do you see that wear hose everyday?)

on Mar 29, 2004
Women have to choose what they want? Do they want to work or do they want to raise a family? If they want to work, then they're going to need to find a spouse who will raise a family. If people want it both ways, then they'll have to work twice as hard.

Also, people should leave women such as Calista Flockhart alone. Maybe what they do is unhealthy, but what about the other side of things? Remember: obesity is worse than smoking. Criticizing women for being too skinny and not criticizing women such as Aretha Franklin for being too fat is just a double standard.
2 Pages1 2